site_and_regional_planning
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| site_and_regional_planning [2022/05/03 15:07] – created admin | site_and_regional_planning [2026/02/09 10:39] (current) – [Case Example: St. Fancis Addition to the Village of Cross Plains] megan_duffy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| *//Restore soil permeability// | *//Restore soil permeability// | ||
| *//Minimize directly connected impervious area// | *//Minimize directly connected impervious area// | ||
| - | *//Use bioretention and other practices to increase infiltration// | + | *//Use bioretention and other practices to increase infiltration// |
| - | =====Case Example: St. Fancis | + | =====Case Example: St. Francis |
| The St. Francis Addition is a 72-acre, 80-lot subdivision in the Village of Cross Plains that demonstrates good site planning. | The St. Francis Addition is a 72-acre, 80-lot subdivision in the Village of Cross Plains that demonstrates good site planning. | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| Many of the practices and techniques discussed above are commonly referred to as “conservation design” or “low-impact design.” | Many of the practices and techniques discussed above are commonly referred to as “conservation design” or “low-impact design.” | ||
| - | [[File:/ | + | [{{ :subdivision.png?600 |Conventional subdivision layout (left) and conservation subdivision layout (right)}}] |
| - | + | ||
| - | ====Figure 2: Conventional subdivision layout (left) and conservation subdivision layout (right)==== | + | |
| Dane County encourages conservation design by providing incentives in the ordinance for features commonly associated with conservation or low impact practices. | Dane County encourages conservation design by providing incentives in the ordinance for features commonly associated with conservation or low impact practices. | ||
| Line 75: | Line 73: | ||
| Dane County’s Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Ordinance does not prohibit regional treatment for stormwater management. | Dane County’s Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Ordinance does not prohibit regional treatment for stormwater management. | ||
| - | Cities and villages in Dane County that have adopted regional stormwater plans may want to establish a “fee-in-lieu” program and identify its requirements in their ordinances. | + | Cities and villages in Dane County that have adopted regional stormwater plans may want to establish a “fee-in-lieu” program and identify its requirements in their ordinances. |
| + | |||
| + | :!: Fee-in-lieu may not be used as an alternative to meeting the county’s minimum standards. | ||
| Dane County’s ordinance allows municipalities that establish a fee-in-lieu program to allow owners of sites served by an off-site stormwater management facility to pay a fee-in-lieu of on-site control. | Dane County’s ordinance allows municipalities that establish a fee-in-lieu program to allow owners of sites served by an off-site stormwater management facility to pay a fee-in-lieu of on-site control. | ||
site_and_regional_planning.1651604857.txt.gz · Last modified: by admin
